Search for: "Patent Litigation Group" Results 1061 - 1080 of 3,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2010, 11:25 am by Woodrow Pollack
This and all such other actions, which dot the greensward of patent litigation like an infestation of dandelions, have been prompted by the Federal Circuit's decision in [Forest Group] which has created the prospect of extraordinarily large damage awards in qui tam suits brought to enforce Sectino 292(a).Zojo Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 9:51 pm by Scott McKeown
  That is, typically, a group of defendants of a multi-defendant suit  would stagger their filings against a subject patent. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 2:13 am by Rose Hughes
: CIIs, Training ANNs and other stories, Wednesday 4th December 2024UCL IBIL course: AI for Lawyers: Technological Understanding for Compliance and Litigation. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
The 1779 petition (the last Privy Council revocation ever) came only after the patentee twice refused instructions to litigate the patent’s validity in a court of law. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:35 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Ian Bryan, IP Counsel, GE Healthcare Vineet Kohli, Senior Patent Attorney, Merck John Beatty, Patent Procedures Management, European Patent Office Dr Roman Maksymiw, Head of Division, German Patent and Trademark Office, DPMA Lawrence Cullen, Deputy Director, IPO Dr Scott Alban, Head of IP, MedImmune Allen Norris, Vice President, Head Group IP, UCB Pharma SA Peter Thomsen, Manager Global IP Litigation and Global Policy,… [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 10:00 pm
Gregory “Lars” Gunnerson is a Patent Attorney in the Mechanical and Electrical Patent Practice Group at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:02 am by By Sandra Park, ACLU
  The case was brought by the ACLU, along with the Public Patent Foundation, on behalf of 20medical organizations, geneticists, health advocacy groups, and patients and challenged patents controlled by Myriad Genetics on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:39 am by Mark Reichel
Patent No. 7,669,123, available HERE), according to a recent PC Magazine article (available HERE), covers a technology first launched by Facebook in 2006 as the "news feed," which lets a Facebook member keep track of his or her friends' on-site activity, such as by joining a group or writing on another's "wall. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:51 am by Charles P. Romano, Ph.D.
 is a Senior Patent Agent in the MVS Biotechnology & Chemical Practice Group. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
Members of the last group are sometimes derisively referred to as “patent trolls” because they are not seen by critics as contributing to the technological development of an industry. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Innovation Act sets up a presumption that the loser of a patent infringement litigation would have to pay the attorney’s fees of the winner unless the loser’s positions were objectively reasonable. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 9:29 am by Gregory J. Brodzik
Patent No. 5,206,244 (the “'244 Patent”) “in connection with BMS’s Baraclude Product,” and BMS sought to enforce claim 8 of that patent, which “covers the chemical compound entecavir. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 1:02 pm by Ronald Mann
Recognizing that the premise of the statute is that the administrative process provides a path cheaper than litigation for businesses to eliminate weak patents asserted against them, Ginsburg asked, for example, “[W]hy would Congress want to leave a government agency out of this second look if the idea is to weed out patents that never should have been given in the first place? [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 11:41 pm by Florian Mueller
From a pure patent litigation point of view, however, the afternoon part of yesterday's court session was even more important.The second patent-in-suit is EP3119141 on a "technique for performing a random access procedure over a radio interface. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:31 pm by Joe Mullin
Contrast that with the hundreds of thousands of dollars—at going rates for IP litigation FedEx's costs—that FedEx has probably spent in legal fees to "uninvent" the '377 patent. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:30 am by Woodrow Pollack
§ 292] requires the penalty to be imposed on a per article basis.The Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]