Search for: "People v. Gay" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
""I think people have gotten past the anger and the insult," she told Glover, "but let's not have it happen again. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Bruen) and one repudiating abortion rights (Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:18 pm
By Mike Dorf Federal district courts have recently taken action on gay rights on three fronts: (1) Perry v. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 9:40 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
Although the School was entitled to take objection to the posts on the grounds that their language was gratuitously offensive to gay and/or trans people, the Court believed that the dismissal was unquestionably a disproportionate response. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:05 pm
The verdict was eagerly anticipated, not just by lawyers and court watchers, but also by activists and a broad cross-section of ordinary people. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
However, a federal appeals ruling last week in Massachusetts (Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 5:19 am
What person who holds similar views to Schlafly about the role of women, about creationism v. evolution, about gay rights, etc., would not be similarly objectionable as a recipient of an honorary degree? [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:00 am by Liam Thornton
If so, the tribunal then has to ask itself whether it was satisfied that gay people who lived openly would be liable to persecution. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:59 am by Eric Segall
By Eric SegallProfessor Adrian Vermeule of Harvard Law School is somewhat of a polarizing figure whose opposition to gay rights and same-sex marriage are, to this writer, unpersuasive and troubling. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 11:24 am
" The firm has 11 openly gay partners, one of whom is David Braff, who has publicly defended the firm from homophobic accusations. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:41 pm
A unanimous three-judge panel of the California 3rd District Court of Appeal ruled on October 14 in Woods v. [read post]