Search for: "People v. King" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2013, 1:21 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
King , in which they are asked to decide whether or not the Fourth Amendment allows states to collect and analyze DNA from people arrested for, but not convicted of, criminal offenses, solely for use in investigating other offenses for which there is no individualized suspicion. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 7:54 am by Steve Lubet
Johnson) or Shawn Eichman (the defendant in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:44 pm
Often these were people who were illiterate or uneducated. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:55 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Today the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Bond v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
” The Court has denied review of petitions by the same counsel challenging the New Jersey ban and a similar California law in King v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:00 am
[www.nylj.com] Subscription required for online access unless otherwise noted: People, respondent v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:17 am
KINGS COUNTYReal Property Renewed Motion for Order of Reference Is DeniedFor Failure to Comply With CPLR 3215(f) NYCTL 2004-A Trust v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 12:16 am
Henry Cozzani Subscription Required NEW YORK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant Law City Wins injunctive Relief Against Three Single- Room Occupancy Hotels; Rental to Tourists Denied City of New York v. 330 Continental LLC Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYCriminal Practice Defendant Fails to Provide Compelling Reasons To Warrant Dismissal of Domestic Violence Charges People v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:03 am
KINGS COUNTYCriminal Practice Accusatory Instrument Is Deemed Facially Insufficient to Support Harassment Charges People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:41 am
” But it will just as easily –indeed more likely — get you a “deferential” judge who moves heaven and earth to uphold the constitutionality of laws as in NFIB, or defers to the “intent” or purpose of the Congress that enacted the law as in King v. [read post]