Search for: "Perez v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
And an active one it is indeed, with the state supreme court asked to weigh in on a regular basis. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
Perez is already receiving significant attention. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:45 pm
This was in Michigan, and the state’s supreme court said no, the judge did everything right under Perez. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
o SCOTUS docket hereBowie v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:13 am
See Perez, 340 S.W.3d at 451. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Perez v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
In Capital v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm
Judulang v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm
And second, remember that there is a large segment of the membership of the DCBA that has never seen the inside of a State courtroom. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Barber: The court overruled State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Straw, although “stunned,” did not state there was no settlement. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Straw, although “stunned,” did not state there was no settlement. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:07 am
Dawson v White & Case, 88 NY2d 666, 670 [1996]). [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:50 am
S v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:30 am
That’s what we will do with Kruszka v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:14 pm
The California Supreme Court relied on its own decision invalidating an anti-miscegenation law, Perez v. [read post]
