Search for: "Root v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 4,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2013, 10:02 am
That ruling avers that despite the requirement of the state to prove every element of an offense beyond a reasonable doubt, if a challenge to an element of the offense was not "firmly rooted" in state law, the state can bar such a defense without offending due process of law. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 pm
§ 3582(c)), and even though the right to counsel applies to post-sentencing actions that affect time in custody (Mempa v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:28 pm
Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:24 pm
(Electronic Frontier Foundation v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
United States has its roots in Arizona’s perception that the federal government is not doing enough to stem the flow of illegal immigrants into the border state. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 7:08 am
From Nevada Wildlife Alliance v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:12 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:01 am
The state says someone else already had it. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Cuozzo's recognition that §314(d) can bar challenges rooted in provisions other than §314(a) was hardly "dicta," post, at 16—it was the Court's holding. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 6:46 pm
To my knowledge, after dozens if not hundreds of challenges, not a single court has held the CSA unconstitutional, and the most serious challenge to it was rejected almost ten years ago in Gonzales v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 5:30 am
The court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
Lexion Med., LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:18 am
Like he would be in the later Plessy v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 8:27 am
The Download of the Week is McDonald v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
Miramon v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
Miramon v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
Miramon v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 1:54 am
., Levine v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:35 am
In Bowers v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:30 am
But the future utility of such investigations may depend on a cryptic aside made by Chief Justice Roberts in the Court’s 2020 decision in Trump v. [read post]
