Search for: "STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,910
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2014, 8:04 am by Todd Lebowitz
  Specifically, the union claims that the USPS violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by offering employees impacted by the data breach one year of free credit monitoring without first bargaining with the union about the offer. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:06 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Like other employee benefit arrangements, ERISA generally requires that individual or group products offered by employers, unions or both be prudently selected and managed. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:01 pm by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
(Regarding impact, the Postal Service reportedly is offering employees a one-year of free credit monitoring through Equifax, but the union believes the Postal Service did not have the legal right to decide to offer the Equifax subscription without first offering to Bargain with the union.) [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:41 am by Bart Lazar
” The Union’s complaint further states that by providing free credit monitoring, the USPS made a unilateral change in wages, hours and working conditions. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:00 pm by Frank Crivelli
Starting with this number, all Union members employed by the governmental entity on the last day of the expired agreement can be evaluated by simply “moving those employees through the guide” irrespective as to whether a certain officer retired and/or if new hires were made since that time. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:01 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
The internship would have been a paid position, and Callaghan would have received credits toward a Master’s degree. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:40 am by Jon Hyman
The union specifically took issue with USPS’ offering employees affected by the incident one year of free credit-monitoring, a decision that the postal workers characterized as a unilateral change to wages, hours and working conditions that an employer is generally not permitted to make without first bargaining with the union. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, the "date of hire" might not necessarily be the same date to be used to determine an individual's service for seniority purposes for layoff under State law.For example, assume Employee A was provisionally appointed on January 1, and Employee B was appointed February 1, of the same year. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 2:58 pm by Dheeraj K. Singhal
It can also mean laying off employees, opening up negotiations with unions and closing some locations. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
Burwell, 14-114, asking whether the Affordable Care Act’s federal tax-credit subsidies for health insurance purchased through an “Exchange established by the State” also apply to insurance policies purchased through federal exchanges. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am by Maureen Johnston
DocRx, Inc. 14-287Issue: Whether a foreign judgment obtained by fraud must be enforced by a forum state under the Full Faith and Credit Clause. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:47 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer both has continuously worked with businesses and their management to monitor and respond to federal and state legislative, regulatory and enforcement concerns and has helped them to anticipate and help shape federal, state and other laws, regulations, and enforcement., As a key component of this work, Ms. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 6:09 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Therefore, employees participating in such arrangements are ineligible for premium tax credits (or cost-sharing reductions) for Marketplace coverage. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:54 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Among other things, the Notice states that an employer that offers a Non-Hospital/Non-Physician Services Plan (including a Pre-November 4, 2014 Non-Hospital/Non-Physician Services Plan) to an employee must: Not state or imply in any disclosure that the offer of coverage under the Non-Hospital/Non-Physician Services Plan precludes an employee from obtaining a premium tax credit, if otherwise eligible, and Timely correct any prior disclosures that… [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina 14-35Issue: Whether the government speech doctrine permits the state of North Carolina to promote its “Choose Life” message through a specialty license plate program over which it exercises complete and effective control without also offering a pro-choice specialty plate. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:20 am by Christine E. Lyon and Karin Retzer
In the United States, these laws tend to focus on personal information such as social security numbers, driver’s license numbers, and credit or debit card or financial account numbers. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:03 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
State Senator Phil Berger said he will push a bill in the state legislature designed to protect magistrates, registrars of deeds and state employees who refuse to officiate same-sex weddings on the basis of their religious beliefs. [read post]