Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2016, 9:05 am by Robin Shea
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to the Supreme Court vacancy created by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 20–1199. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 20–1199. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:15 pm
Minnesota ex rel Olson, 283 U.S. 697, 713 (1931). [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:48 am by Joy Waltemath
Rather, looking to the plain language of the relevant FCA provision, the appeals court followed the Fifth and Sixth Circuits, and held the attorney general has absolute veto power over voluntary qui tam settlements (U.S. ex rel Michaels and Whitesides v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
(Bauman citations omitted), certified for interlocutory appeal on other issue, 2014 WL 7533913 (D. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Thus, the Court of Appeals properly reviewed the District Court’s conclusions of law de novo. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 27 March 2015, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Vidal-Hall v Google ([2015] EWCA Civ 311). [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Supreme Court’s denial of review in State v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:27 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeApplication Note Clarified Scope of Guidelines Increase; Ex Post Facto Clause Not Implicated United States, appellee v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:08 am by Greg Jacobs
In a case of first impression in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the court held in United States ex rel. [read post]