Search for: "STATE v. SAMPLE" Results 1061 - 1080 of 4,543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2008, 3:10 pm
The distinct question of "Whether a state forensic analyst's laboratory report prepared for use in a criminal prosecution is 'testimonial' evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause as set forth in Crawford v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm by Martin Miller
As we stated in that post, the 6-4 en banc decision by the CAFC in Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:32 am by lennyesq
Quick Links to Issue Areas For Employment Advocates For Housing Attorneys For Reentry Case Managers and Discharge Planners Padilla v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 am by David Smith
H argued that this was wrong and stated that the exclusion of 16 properties from a sample of just 111 demonstrated that the 16 properties were not really so exceptional. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 am by David Smith
H argued that this was wrong and stated that the exclusion of 16 properties from a sample of just 111 demonstrated that the 16 properties were not really so exceptional. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
One might have thought that the Court went out of its way to avoid finding that the primary purpose of the DNA collection at issue is “to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing,” (Indianapolis v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 11:44 am
  The Ohio Supreme court tackled that issue a year ago in State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Simpson…  In State v. [read post]