Search for: "Sides v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 24,155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2009, 3:29 pm
And does the United States take that position today? [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:46 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a lot about the Ninth Circuit’s en banc case in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
Wyeth v .Levine!!!! [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
Wyeth v .Levine!!!! [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:44 am
Olson and David Boies, who represented opposing sides in the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:54 am
In Matter of Kaur v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:42 pm
US v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm
United States, 519U.S. 172, 183 n.7 (1997); United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
If successful there, a challenger then had to obtain a writ of scire facias in the law side of the Court of Chancery. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:19 pm
(DMC No. 4207) State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 5:27 pm
Howard already promised that my reaction to today's Supreme Court decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:49 pm
[In a 5-4 decision, the male justices side with the state and industry challengers and the female justices side with the Environmental Protection Agency] In the first of his two opinions today, Justice Gorsuch wrote for a five-member Supreme Court majority in Ohio v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:04 am
The CAFC sided with the University of Utah:UMass argued that, because the dispute was betweentwo States, the Supreme Court had exclusive originaljurisdiction. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
Taylor, Jan. 14, 2016, Washington State Supreme Court More Blog Entries: Samson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
Friday afternoon’s oral argument in Suleiman saw pretty even questioning of counsel for both sides from an interested panel. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:29 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 2:02 pm
SUPREME COURT BP PLC, et al. v Mayor and City of BaltimoreThe issue the court confronted was a procedural matter: Can the defendant energy companies use the federal removal statutes (see 28 USC Section 1442) to remove a state law climate change lawsuit to federal court? [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
Piacentile v. [read post]
