Search for: "Slate v State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2016, 2:15 am
The CJEU has been slated to answer the question of third-party liability for those who provide free WiFi in the case of copyright infringement, and awaiting that the opinion of Advocate General Szpunar has given their answer as to this highly important question.The case of Tobias McFadden v Sony Music Entertainment Germany GmbH deals with Tobias McFadden, who owned a business selling and renting lighting and sound systems for various events, and offered… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
Here are just some of the reasons given by Justice Scheinkman: Schaeffer valued JGJg at $23 million by assigning a net present value to non-existent California health clubs slated for later development under the ADA. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 5:20 pm
" Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am
An Alabama-based pharmaceutical company is slated to pay almost $40 million to 47 states over allegations that it improperly labeled multivitamin fluoride tablets. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am
An Alabama-based pharmaceutical company is slated to pay almost $40 million to 47 states over allegations that it improperly labeled multivitamin fluoride tablets. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am
An Alabama-based pharmaceutical company is slated to pay almost $40 million to 47 states over allegations that it improperly labeled multivitamin fluoride tablets. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am
An Alabama-based pharmaceutical company is slated to pay almost $40 million to 47 states over allegations that it improperly labeled multivitamin fluoride tablets. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
General Martins begins by calling Judge Pohl’s attention to the ‘ten-category framework’ from his 2014 discovery order in United States v. al Nashiri. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
This means that the agency need not always provide a more detailed justification than what would suffice for a new policy created on a blank slate. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am
” At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein argues that United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
President Obama already has stated that he intends to nominate a replacement, and the White House has signaled that it has been preparing a slate of potential nominees. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:50 am
United States, which is currently scheduled for oral argument on February 22? [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:24 pm
President Obama already has stated that he intends to nominate a replacement, and the White House has signaled that it has been preparing a slate of potential nominees. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:31 am
"The demise of the MPPC happened in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am
Jackson wrote in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 9:07 am
” * Tagupa v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:51 am
” More commentary on Friedrichs v. [read post]
