Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Brown" Results 1061 - 1080 of 3,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I remember vividly first reading Simple Justice, Richard Kluger’s magisterial account of the road to Brown v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
It is helpful to start with the dissenting reasons of Justices Côté[xi] and Brown in LSBC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:40 am by boston
In fact, Cardone said, the church would have run afoul of the law only if it engaged in activities that amounted to making a contribution to a political campaign.Cardone also noted in her Hoyt v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Louisville, of course, had required segregated schools under the law prior to Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:50 am by Nabiha Syed
Finally, coverage of Brown v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 8:21 am
Some notable quotables from the discussion: *"The courts in the era of Thurgood Marshall and Brown v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” — @mattwelch), yet more on trafficking-panic numbers] Group libel laws, though approved in the 1952 case Beauharnais v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
  See, e.g., this post from 2007.Comparing the rapid change after the Act with the snail's pace change in the decade between Brown v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:21 pm by Margaret Peachy
  In this time, he worked on several briefs for landmark Civil Rights cases such as Brown v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:53 pm
The opinion testimony of the medical director improperly intruded upon the function of the jury to determine whether to credit the victim's statements (see People v Eberle, 265 AD2d 881, 882)...With respect to the contention of defendant that he was denied a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct, we agree with defendant that the prosecutor improperly appealed to the jurors' sympathies in his opening statement (see People v Brown, 26 AD3d 392,… [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
That is the nature of pluralism in a democratic society but it tends to show that, on this topic (and in the words of Browne-Wilkinson V-C in Stephens), there is no “generally accepted code of sexual morality”. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
Lord Rodger agreed with Lord Hope, Lord Scott and Lord Brown. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
" U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, March 04, 2008 Brown v. [read post]