Search for: "UNited States v. White" Results 1061 - 1080 of 7,191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
Toomey, citing School District 6 v NYSHRB, 35 NY2d 371, said that such a personnel policy, even if the product of negotiations under [the Taylor Law] would violate the State’s Human Rights Law and is therefore a prohibited subject of negotiations.* See Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:43 pm by Unknown
United States (FTCA)Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Both casesare brought by a non-profit organization long committed to ending all affirmative action in the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
On Wednesday, April 22, in Ricci v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:34 pm by Bart Torvik
You might have thought the case, United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 10:50 am
United States, 531 U.S. 12 (2000), the defendants made a motion to dismiss the Scheme to Defraud charges on the grounds that the broker-dealer licenses could not be considered "property. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:30 pm by Karen Tani
By the time the year was over, thirty-eight Dakota men had been hanged in the largest mass execution in United States history. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
But most unforgivably, Judge Waring opened the all-white Democratic Primary in South Carolina to blacks with his ruling in Elmore v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 6:52 am
The survey included questions about a hypothetical African American couple, Reggie and Latisha, of the African Methodist Church and a white couple Todd and Allison, of the United Methodist Church. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:50 am
United States, No. 13-7451, in which the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley act's prohibition against the destruction of evidence applies to a fisherman who tossed a couple of allegedly undersized red grouper overboard before federal agents could seize the piscatorial evidence. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:13 am by Kathy Darvil
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, applying strict scrutiny, upheld the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions policies. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 4:09 am by Brett Holubeck
United States, which concerns individuals that exceed their access privileges on computers and will have implications for employers that try to protect their trade secrets. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]