Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 51,328
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm
After rage-tweeting throughout the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
Circuit Court of Appeals’ AMA v FTC case from 1980). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Thus, in Nixon v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:37 am
Bruin acquired, used, or disclosed Applied’s trade secrets by improper means—but Applied wasn’t harmed, and Bruin wasn’t enriched by that improper acquisition, use, or disclosure. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:45 am
What if the authorisation is then annulled : can the right holder (continue to) use the evidence? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 8:55 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:45 pm
Shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:28 pm
CCNV (1984)), and the government's power to limit the use of property used for a public university is even greater than its power as to parks (Widmar v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Given that the selection of studies that go into a systematic review and meta-analysis can be dispositive of its conclusion, undue subjectivity or ad [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 7:22 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
He has predicted a “bloodbath” if he is not elected (although his meaning has been contested, with some saying he was referring to violence and others that “Trump was talking about US automakers. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The Court of Chancery recently examined such an agreement in In West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 1:32 pm
At issue in Moyle v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Let’s talk about Easha’s first case, Murray v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Teva v Lilly: DCT Judgment And Memo Teva v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:46 am
The general principle here (see Weinberger v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:40 am
Govern yourself accordingly.If someone sent you this email, subscribe here.SHARE HEARSAYDon’t keep us a secret. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:53 am
In fact, this is not Puma versus Rihanna but, eventually, Rihanna’s Instagram activities, unintentionally, happened to become the death knell to Puma’s registered Community Design (‘RCD’) no. 3320555-0002 (‘contested RCD’).But how could it be that a famous fashion icon failed to establish valid design protection for a shoe, in the EU, that used to become a bestseller (here and here)? [read post]