Search for: "US v. Powell" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,349
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2010, 9:13 am by Kashmir Hill
ACLU says California DNA law violates privacy [San Francisco Chronicle] Haskell v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  (Discussion of Schatzer and Powell here.) [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Matthew Hill
(ii)           “The enhanced obligation”: The courts have implied an obligation under Article 2 to carry out an effective investigation into credible cases in which the state’s primary duties under the Article may have been breached (e.g. if there are suspicions that state actors used force to kill).[4] This obligation requires a state toinitiate the necessary proceedings.[5] In addition to the criminal law (and in… [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:16 pm by Mary
This rule was put in years ago when Michael Powell was Chair of the FCC, under George W. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
The following exchange occurred at the hearing after Powell pled guilty: PEOPLE v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
The People correctly concede the error, but urge us to remand the matter for further proceedings. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:53 pm by David S. Cohen
 The narrowest grounds rule of Marks tells us that Justice Powell's opinion is controlling.Why doesn't this rule then apply to McDonald? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Powell and Harry Blackmun (Nixon), David H. [read post]