Search for: "United States v. California" Results 1061 - 1080 of 13,831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2019, 10:15 pm by Cannabis Law Group
We could see this changing, especially because part because the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Ross v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm by Kerry Shapiro
SWRCB adopted the Procedures in April 2019 to supplement state-perceived gaps in federal Clean Water Act regulation for proposed discharges of dredged or fill material to broadly defined “waters of the state,” including all wetlands within California – not just wetlands considered “Waters of the United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:16 pm by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
For a court to be bound by a decision of the United States Supreme Court, rather than the California Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court must have decided the same question differently. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Chatterjee v CBS, 6:19-CV-212-REW United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:50 pm by Kerry Shapiro
For over 20 years, Kerry has represented the construction and building materials industry on mineral extraction and land development projects, and has secured entitlements for the largest federally-approved sand and gravel project in the United States, obtained the first-ever vested rights confirmation from the State of California for the largest construction aggregate deposit in California, and successfully represented clients before the Ninth Circuit… [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am by Dan Stein
Coverage continues of the Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 9:01 am by Charles Kotuby
The United States Supreme Court just last week granted a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari in OBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 3:43 pm
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348 (Iskanian) precluded enforcement of PAGA waivers, but asserted that Iskanian was wrongly decided and in any event was no longer good law in light of the 2018 opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm by Mike
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]