Search for: "United States v. Li" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2022, 8:40 am by JURIST Staff
A bill to codify abortion rights was defeated Wednesday in the United States Senate. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:42 am by Larry
Rather, under the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Rather, its significance lies in the application of the law to the facts. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:06 am by John Hopkins
In April 1994, in the now-famous congressional hearings before the United States House of Representatives' Subcommittee on Health and the Environment, Big Tobacco executives asserted yet again that the causal relationship of smoking and cancer had not been proven: the CEOs of ... [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:05 pm
  The answer lies in a District Court’s pendent jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:30 am by Shu-Yi Oei
However, in March, the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico ruled in Wal-Mart Puerto Rico v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
  One need look no further than the frequent tweets of the president of the United States to prove the point. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm by Jimmy Verner
Hague cases: A federal district court abused its discretion by deferring to a state court when asked to identify the habitual residence of the children and whether they had been wrongfully removed to the United States from Israel. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 1:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
United States, 364 U.S. 40 (1960) While the consent of individual officials representing the United States cannot "estop" the United States, it can lead to the fruition of a number of expectancies embodied in the concept of "property" expectancies that, if sufficiently important, the Government must condemn and pay for before it takes over the management of the landowner's property. [read post]