Search for: "United States v. Li" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:05 pm
  The answer lies in a District Court’s pendent jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:06 am by John Hopkins
In April 1994, in the now-famous congressional hearings before the United States House of Representatives' Subcommittee on Health and the Environment, Big Tobacco executives asserted yet again that the causal relationship of smoking and cancer had not been proven: the CEOs of ... [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:30 am by Shu-Yi Oei
However, in March, the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico ruled in Wal-Mart Puerto Rico v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
  One need look no further than the frequent tweets of the president of the United States to prove the point. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm by Jimmy Verner
Hague cases: A federal district court abused its discretion by deferring to a state court when asked to identify the habitual residence of the children and whether they had been wrongfully removed to the United States from Israel. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 1:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
United States, 364 U.S. 40 (1960) While the consent of individual officials representing the United States cannot "estop" the United States, it can lead to the fruition of a number of expectancies embodied in the concept of "property" expectancies that, if sufficiently important, the Government must condemn and pay for before it takes over the management of the landowner's property. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
“The right of every citizen to vote, guaranteed by [Section Three] of the Charter, lies at the heart of Canadian democracy,” wrote Mr. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
 By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
United States, Polygamy, and Imperialism, (William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-43, Feb. 26, 2010).Jill I. [read post]