Search for: "United States v. Taylor"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
The Baze Decision On April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issuedits plurality opinion in Baze v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
Levi, 3 S.W. 444, 447 (Tex. 1887); Taylor v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In the recent case (Taylor v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Corizon, Inc., 949 F.3d 489, 506 (9th Cir. 2020) (Bumatay, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc) (same); United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:02 am
Roy is a Trial Attorney, Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
”); United States v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Taylor, 106 S.W.3d 692, 694 n.3 (Tex. 2003). [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
The states’ primary argument is that Missouri has standing because it created and controls the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, one of the largest holders and servicers of student loans in the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 11:18 am
In State of Ohio v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:46 am
United States Postal Serv., 756 F.2d 1461, 1464 (9th Cir.1985) (stating test for Rule 41(b), the precursor to Rule 52(c)). [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:24 am
Arthur v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:41 am
Fed. ...See all stories on this topic STATE v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
In Canada v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:50 pm
The first case, Biden v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
