Search for: "Washington v. Hand" Results 1061 - 1080 of 3,641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am by Gordon Todd
Circuit’s unanimous en banc opinion in SpeechNow.org v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 10:45 am by Florian Mueller
Simply put, someone who triggers a court action or arbitration to have the FRAND terms set, and is willing to take a license on the final terms, should be on the safe side now.In connection with the appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Supreme Court in 1869, ruled that Texas did NOT have a right to secede, in the case, Texas v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:45 am by David Markus
Supreme Court.Not once, but twice.The latest rendition of Lozman v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Bursch, and Detroit lawyer George Washington in the affirmative action case of Schuette -v- Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
He might join in the chorus of applause about the text of South Africa’s constitution, the formal imprimatur of rights, and the mostly impressive series of judgments handed down by the Constitutional Court. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:54 pm by Florian Mueller
On September 4, a federal jury rendered a verdict on the claim of a breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing in the Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the Washington Post, Justin Driver reviews a new book on the Burger Court by Michael J. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 9:00 am by William A. Schreiner, Jr.
   But since our beloved Washington football club was essentially eliminated from contention in about, er, October, none of it has really mattered much to us. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:21 am by Timothy P. Flynn
As a member of the public, any one of us can go to Washington D.C. and stand in line at the SCOTUS to hopefully obtain one of the few hundred seats in the gallery of the High Court to observe the legal arguments first hand. [read post]