Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me." Results 1061 - 1080 of 7,293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm by John Elwood
Now please bear with me, as I have to be a bit abbreviated this week because of the press of business. [read post]
6 May 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  Time will tell when and where proof of vaccination will be necessary, and I realize that some states, such as Florida this week, are going the opposite direction, banning bars, businesses, schools, and government entities from asking anyone to provide proof of a COVID-19 vaccination — at the same time that Florida is enacting other laws that leave me, and other fans of democracy, rolling our eyes. [read post]
4 May 2021, 5:30 am by Bailey DeSimone
This week’s Pic of the Week is a close-up of one of these beautiful trees. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am by Florian Mueller
After this post, I'll (have to) take a break from blogging about App Store antitrust matters for a few weeks or maybe even months, as I'll explain further below. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 2:55 pm by Ilya Somin
New Jersey features a clash between the power of eminent domain and state sovereign immunity. ] A number of people have asked me what I think about PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:56 am by Florian Mueller
If it were up to me (as it obviously isn't), I would accept every plausible and reasonably convincing explanation as to why the relevant case (here, Huawei v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 2:26 pm by vforberger
Credit and applause to JSO for handling this case and passing it on to me. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
He then posted a screen shot of those fraudulent posts in many FB community forums for approx.. two weeks and they went viral. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 3:50 pm by Unknown
State of Oklahoma (Criminal Jurisdiction; Reservation Boundary) News Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html This week, in brief: Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issues en banc decision in Brackeen v. [read post]