Search for: "Appeal of Hughes" Results 1081 - 1100 of 2,193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Colb, a Justia columnist, is Professor of Law and Charles Evans Hughes Scholar at Cornell Law School. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  An appeal, ultimately to the US Supreme Court, soon followed. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 8:56 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court found for the town, and on appeal, Hughes argued that the court erred in determining that the Town of Eddington Planning Board and Board of Selectmen conducted a valid joint executive session, invoked for the purpose of consulting with counsel. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
This was the argument which the British Columbia Court of Appeal accepted. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Crim 829 The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the appeal holding that the driving must have been at fault for a person to be convicted of aggravated vehicle taking under s12A of the Theft Act 1968. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Hugh’s Contracting Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Colb, a Justia columnist, is Professor of Law and Charles Evans Hughes Scholar at Cornell Law School. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:04 am by Tom Smith
via www.realclearpolitics.com I heard a joke on Hugh Hewitt last night from author Matt Lewis: Why does everyone hate Ted Cruz so much? [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
Lee, 15-446, presenting two questions about review of decisions rendered by the Patent and Trial Appeal Board; Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix
This appeal concerns jurisdiction of the ECHR and common law protection in the context of a request for an inquiry into a mass shooting by British soldiers in a British Protectorate in 1948. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
On appeal, the Second Circuit concluded it lacked authority to hear his case because it challenged the IJ’s factual conclusions. [read post]