Search for: "Barns v. Barns"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2011, 6:15 am
” And in the Washington Post, Robert Barnes previews Florence v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:29 pm
Feb. 3, 2010)(citing Barnes v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:28 am
Indeed, although leave to amend a pleading is to be freely granted, leave should be denied where, as here, the opponent would suffer prejudice or surprise resulting directly from the delay in seeking leave, or the proposed amendment is palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit (see CPLR 3025[b]; Nissenbaum v Ferazzoli, 171 AD2d 654, 655; Barnes v County of Nassau, 108 AD2d 50, 52). [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
Barnes, 948 F.2d 325, 330 (7th Cir.1991); United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Why the CFAA and ECPA claims were dismissed In this case, concerning the CFAA and ECPA claims, the court looked to Barnes v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
Barnes and Dr. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 10:01 am
My friend and fellow Salvatori Fellow Brad Smith (former Chair of the Federal Elections Committee) has a WSJ op-ed on this week's SCOTUS decision in Citizen United v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 9:33 am
In Fordham v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:25 pm
Václav Bartuška, the Czech ambassador-at-large for Energy Security.. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:49 pm
At first sight it appeared to be a settlement, which surprised me because I had attended a Microsoft v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:49 am
Lyle Denniston covered the orders for this blog; other coverage of the grant in Toca came from Adam Liptak of The New York Times and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am
Barnes & Noble dropped the book the day after Sen. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:30 pm
Not surprisingly, yesterday’s decision in DC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:19 am
There's new state-level legislation banning abortion after the 20th week, premised on the notion of fetal pain and building on the legal precedent in Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 1:10 pm
In today's Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports here on yesterday's argument in Scott v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:13 pm
Carroll v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:06 pm
Barnes, 2010 Wash. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:56 am
The onus of proof of unsoundness is on the party seeking to avoid the examination (Barnes v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 10:28 pm
Reaffirming its earlier decision in Merchants Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:17 pm
Project Playlist, Barnes v. [read post]
