Search for: "Beare v. State" Results 1081 - 1100 of 15,030
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
G expressed disagreement with the core of ISL—that elected state legislatures were freed of the state constitutions that created those very legislatures by virtue of something in the federal Constitution. [read post]
It bears repeating that downstream innovation is important in the EU, especially in the IoT space. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Last Term, the Court, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:05 am by SHG
What Article V of the Constitution does say is that Congress is in charge of proposing amendments that it deems necessary. [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:16 am by Jonathan Cedarbaum
While some other sources may put the figure a few percentage points lower, the attractiveness of phishing remains unwavering, whether to nation-state cyber forces, private criminal organizations, or groups that straddle both of those worlds. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
John the Evangelist Killingworth, supra, in which the Chancellor stated: “[53]. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Daniel Harawa (Washington University School of Law) has posted NYSRPA V. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Town of Hempstead v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2023 NY Slip Op 02129 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Town of Hempstead v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2023 NY Slip Op 02129 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, Egbert has no bearing on Disney's suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against state officials (where both a federal statute and the doctrine of Ex Parte Young provide causes of action).Even so, as Prof Buchanan observed in his essay here yesterday, there is a prima facie similarity between Disney's lawsuit and the challenge to the third version of Trump's Travel Ban that SCOTUS rejected in Trump v. [read post]