Search for: "Breyer Law Offices" Results 1081 - 1100 of 2,579
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2014, 9:00 am by Lyle Denniston
Breyer signaled in a recent opinion that this is an open question. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
  Clearly cherry picking was a bad thing for a judicial officer to do when charged with the administration of justice. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:48 am by Amy Howe
” In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:59 am by Parker Higgins
As Justice Breyer has said, "If it isn't public, it's not a law. [...] [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
Ben noted the Supreme Court’s denial of cert in Hussain v Obama, and Justice Breyer’s statement on the same. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
North Carolina, 13-604 (involving the validity of a search resulting from a police officer’s mistake of law); Zivotofsky v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:25 pm
Justice Scalia found this irrelevant: [W]e are aware of no principle that would allow us to decide at what point a code of law becomes so expansive and so commonly violated that infraction itself can no longer be the ordinary measure of the lawfulness of enforcement. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:58 am by Lyle Denniston
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
Shrink Missouri Government PAC (Breyer, concurring). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:58 pm by Joey Fishkin
 And Justice Breyer surely has a point that one good word to describe that problem is “corruption. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:41 pm by Ronald Mann
” Solicitor General Donald Verrilli had a slightly rougher time, trying to articulate the boundary drawn in the brief filed by his office on behalf of the Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Many roundtables at Office and PTO/NTIA have begun. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:49 am by Ilya Shapiro
Justice Breyer delivered the Court’s opinion with respect to BCRA Title V–§504 . . . . [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:01 pm by Amy Howe
Breyer’s dissent lamented that the Court’s decision “eviscerates our Nation’s campaign finance laws, leaving a remnant incapable of dealing with the grave problems of democratic legitimacy that those laws were intended to resolve. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:38 pm by Dennis Crouch
That is what the patent laws have always been for. . . . [read post]