Search for: "Carter v. Carter" Results 1081 - 1100 of 2,610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
"the agency has issued an unambiguously final decision that puts the [individual] on notice that all administrative appeals have been exhausted" [see Matter of Carter v State of N.Y., Exec. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:04 pm
Reporting today on the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
OCA's treatment of its May 27 constructive denial as a final agency determination is inconsistent with its statements notifying petitioner that it had opportunities for further administrative appeals (see Matter of Carter v State of N.Y., Exec. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
OCA's treatment of its May 27 constructive denial as a final agency determination is inconsistent with its statements notifying petitioner that it had opportunities for further administrative appeals (see Matter of Carter v State of N.Y., Exec. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:07 pm
Particularly if one breaks out the three Carter appointees and adds that Judge Dorothy Nelson -- who was senior but on the panel -- gets to be in the draw if she'd like (I assume that's the rule with full en banc calls in addition to limited en banc panels), you get a bare majority vote to flip the case around.Mind you, there are assuredly factors the other way, including the fact that many judges may not vote for full en banc review for administrative or historical reasons, and… [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 5:49 am by alysondrake
She remained a well-known member of politics until 1979 (prior to which she was mentioned as being a possible running mate with President Carter) when she retired to become an adjunct professor at UT Austin. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:21 am
Jones had a very good draw (good for him, anyway, and bad for the Arizona Attorney General) and got three Democratic appointees: one from Carter (Betty Fletcher) and two from Clinton (Hawkins and Thomas). [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Murillo v Turnbull, 2016 ONSC 1906 [26] Taking on a personal injury file on a contingent fee basis is a gamble. [read post]