Search for: "Case v. Taylor"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 3,591
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2008, 4:27 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 6:08 am
The Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:45 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Case law indicates that a probationary employee may be terminated at any time after the completing his or her minimum period of probation prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation [see Gray v Bronx Developmental Center, 65 NY2d 904] unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14]. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
Cascardo v Dratel 2019 NY Slip Op 02957 Decided on April 18, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is a combination legal malpractice, excessive billing, fraud breach of fiduciary duty case which had several claims weeded out for this plaintiff. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:05 pm
Random drug testing of teachersSource: National Law Journal ArticleEducators are challenging new policies being adopted by school districts requiring them to submit to random drug tests for illegal drugs.Pending cases include Jones v Graham County [North Carolina] Board of Education [COA 08-477]; American Federation of Teachers v Kanawah County [West Virginia] Board of Education [08-Misc 421]; and Hawaii State Teachers Association and Hawaii Labor Relations Board… [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 6:19 am
” (Frew v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:38 am
An example of this is found in the Appellate Division's ruling in Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929.Under the terms of a disciplinary settlement, Taylor was subject to termination without any hearing if, in the opinion of his superior, his job performance was adversely affected by Taylor's consumption of alcohol. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:09 am
Regarding Starnet's claim for reimbursement the court said there was no statutory mechanism to make this happen (remember that workers' compensation is a wholly statutory scheme).In another case, Myers v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 9:01 pm
Louisiana (07-343), involving the constitutionality of imposing the death penalty for child rape, and Taylor v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 7:28 am
Taylor, 465 F.3d 174 (5th Cir.2006); Darby v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm
However, expert testimony may not be received when it inescapably bears solely on proving that a rape occurred akin to the cases of People v Taylor, People v Graham and People v Shay. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 12:00 am
Taylor, 2009 U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:33 am
Superior Ct. (1982) 31 Cal. 3d 147; Taylor v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:38 am
The case is Parker v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:09 pm
The Court's adoption in Taylor of a categorical, rather than case-by-case, approach has led to innumerable problems and inconsistent application for twenty years. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:25 am
We conclude, under the circumstances present in this case, that the search of [Taylor’s] cell phone's call history was a lawful search incident to arrest.People v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
(Heckman v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:42 am
Another case, Taylor v Hammondsport CSD, 267 A.D.2d 987, brought by a teacher, David C. [read post]
