Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 14,560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 am
Office of Special Counsel (D.D.C.) -- determining that OSC properly invoked Exemption 7(C) to withhold the names and identifying information of three Trump administration officials who were investigated for Hatch Act violations, but not the subject of any further law enforcement action. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Court reviews the law of an employer’s liability for the negligent in hiring, training, supervising and retaining an employee alleged to have violent propensities Gonzalez v City of the New York, 2015 NY Slip Op 06869, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThis action arose from the shooting death of Shirley Fontanez by her boyfriend, a New York City Police Officer, Frederick Maselli, at his home, on July 23, 2007. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 6:37 pm
In May 2008, the Division of Workers Compensation hearing officer found that the disc protrusion was a compensable injury, but not the others. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:17 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
Appellate Law – California Supreme Court Decides for Writ Proceedings What Starts the Time to Appeal
28 Aug 2024, 8:22 am
The officer sought review of this outcome by filing a petition for writ of administrative mandate in the trial court, but the trial court denied his petition. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
The court noted "upon being questioned as to whether [the IME examiner] had an opinion about whether the [Petitioner] experienced a causally related period of disability relative [to the] incident, [the IME examiner] responded that he could not say with certainty. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
The court noted "upon being questioned as to whether [the IME examiner] had an opinion about whether the [Petitioner] experienced a causally related period of disability relative [to the] incident, [the IME examiner] responded that he could not say with certainty. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The duty of candor to the tribunal applies to lawyers representing administrative agencies. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The duty of candor to the tribunal applies to lawyers representing administrative agencies. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:32 am
Machado Amadis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Luis V. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:42 am
The court stated that an administrator can be both an officer of the court and an officer of the company because in both capacities their responsibility is to manage the company’s business and property in the creditors’ interests. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
On May 16, 2024, the Court issued its first in a series of blockbuster administrative law decisions: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:24 am
Supreme Court Employers’ Liability Insurance “Trigger” Litigation: BAI (Run Off) Ltd v Durham & Ors [2012] UKSC 14 (28 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) DL v A Local Authority & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 253 (28 March 2012) Abubakar v Entry Clearance Officer (Sannaa) [2012] EWCA Civ 377 (28 March 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Citation Plc v Ellis Whittam Ltd [2012] EWHC 764… [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 7:24 pm
Acknowledging the importance of federal FLSA regulations in the analysis of the exempt duties under California law, the court had no trouble upholding the trial court's determination that Combs spent over 50% of his time on exempt, administrative duties, and that he had therequisite discretion and independent judgment.The case is Combs v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
An attorney representing an individual in an administrative hearing may be disqualified where such representation could result in an actual or apparent “conflict of interest”Tartakoff v New York State Educ. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:14 am
Office of Special Counsel to investigate possible federal Hatch Act violations by the Trump Administration during last month's Republican National Convention. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 1:52 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in the case of Doninger v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
by Dennis Crouch This week, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the administrative patent review case of Cuozzo v. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am
The Court then applied its unanimous Grand Chamber judgment in Cumpǎnǎ and Mazǎre v. [read post]