Search for: "EMPLOYEE DOE 5"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 16,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2008, 1:59 pm
From: Findlaw Case Summaries September 5, 2008. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
Culture does evolve over time but at a glacial pace. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:48 am
If an employee is scheduled for 25 hours the following week and takes intermittent leave for 5 hours that week, he has used 1/5 of a workweek for FMLA purposes. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:45 am
Does this rule mean that it is permitted to set in employment contracts the obligatory terms for employees for the periods less than “entire life”? [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:45 am
While the ADA requires an employer to consider reassignment to a vacant position if the disabled employee cannot be reasonably accommodated in his or her current job, it does not require a promotion as a reasonable accommodation. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:07 am
For the first type of clients, we can usually provide an analysis of their situation with 3 to 5 hours of work. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:39 am
Finally, California does not contain a “highly compensated employee” exemption. 5. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:14 am
(It could and does get worse, by the way, but we'll try to spare you. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:20 pm
Last year, the California Court of Appeals issued a highly instructive opinion in the area of U-5 defamation. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:00 pm
"What, exactly, does that mean? [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 5:10 am
It does not impact the size calculation for business loan and disaster loan assistance—although the SBA has said it will seek comment on a modification of those programs in separate rulemaking.Size under employee-based size standards (i.e., for manufacturing and supply-based NAICS codes) are not affected by the Runway Extension Act or the SBA’s implementation of it; thus, calculation of the number of employees will continue as before under 13 C.F.R. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:17 pm
As part of that analysis, the DOL determined that the ADA was not an employee organization for purposes of ERISA section 3(4) because the ADA does not exist for the purpose of dealing with employers on behalf of employees concerning either an employee benefit plan or other matters incidental to employment relationships. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:09 pm
Your choice does matter. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 3:08 pm
OSHA’s ETS goes into effect on or about November 5, 2021. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:05 pm
How does a developer explore the possibility of an EB-5 financing? [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
Similarly, the longer the period you employed him while accommodating his disability, the more persuasive your arguments that your company does not discriminate against employees with disabilities and that your organization attempts to accommodate persons who need an accommodation to perform the essential functions of the job. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
The Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the law does not require employers to provide off-duty rest periods, and moreover, "simply being on call" does not constitute performing work.The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal, holding as follows: California law "requires employers to authorize off-duty rest periods — that is, time during which an employee is relieved from all work-related duties and free from employer control. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
The Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the law does not require employers to provide off-duty rest periods, and moreover, "simply being on call" does not constitute performing work.The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal, holding as follows: California law "requires employers to authorize off-duty rest periods — that is, time during which an employee is relieved from all work-related duties and free from employer control. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:35 pm
” 5. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 3:54 pm
It does not include the employee’s home or residence unless the employee provides home health care services at their home or residence. [read post]
