Search for: "Fed Ex"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,366
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2013, 6:18 pm
(Ex parte Rasmussen, PTAB 2013.) [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 4:51 pm
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Fed. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
Since the Guardian published the FISA Court order mandating Verizon Business Network Services hand over all its customers' phone records to the National Security Agency in early June, Congress has responded with bill after bill to rein in the NSA's surveillance programs, increase transparency, and reform how the secret FISA Court is staffed and operates. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 6:20 am
Appeal Ct: Mistrial, retrial directed after judge reversed guilty verdict on man’s weapons charge ‘Gay panic’ criminal defense strategies should be curtailed by legislation, ABA House resolves As Critics United, Stalled Battle Against Police Frisking Tactic Took Off Raising Ontario's minimum wage makes good economic sense - Toronto Star European Court of Human Rights Updated Country Profiles Ex-teacher’s case a dilemma for Law Society | The London Free Press -… [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Monsanto Co., 948 F.2d 1264, 1269 (Fed. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:36 am
The Upjohn Co., 122 F.3d 1476 (Fed. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:22 pm
The examiner was reversed in Ex parte FILLATTI. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm
” In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 988 (Fed. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:10 pm
In re Jung, 637 F.3d 1356, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
., 185 F.3d 1311, 1316 (Fed. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 11:18 am
Attorney Michael Kraut of the Kraut Law Group is an ex-prosecutor who spent a decade and a half in the District Attorney's Office, prosecuting cases just like yours. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 12:48 pm
By Dennis Crouch In re Bimeda Research & Development (Fed. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
The appellant won on 101 and 112 P 2, but lost on 103 in Ex parte RileyThe claim in question23. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:26 am
In re Sneed, 710 F.2d 1544, 1550 Fed. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:20 am
The Board reversed the Examiner’s § 102(b) rejection in Ex parte TANIGUCHISchreiber is cited:Although it is well established that claims directed to an apparatus must be distinguished from the prior art in terms of structure rather than function, see, e.g., In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477-78 (Fed. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 11:03 am
Reported the paper:[Rusty] Hardin submitted a bill of $365,045.13, which included $39,587.63 for expenses such as Fed Ex, copying, mileage and hotels, [assistant auditor Julie] Kiley said. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:04 pm
Kimberly-Clark Corp., 216 F.3d 1372, 1379, 55 USPQ2d 1279, 1283 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:40 am
., 4 USPQ2d 1141, 1144 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:03 am
This post examines an opinion a federal district court judgerecently issued in a civil case: Miss Universe, LLP v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:47 am
In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1266 (Fed. [read post]
