Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
A “home” can be a single family dwelling, a 2-4 family home, a manufactured home, a condo unit, or a residential coop unit. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am
Aizenman of the Washington Post reports that state-based insurance marketplaces “hang in the balance” of the Court’s decision. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
In order to prevent conflict between state and federal courts, Congress enacted the Anti-Injunction Act4 in 1793. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 11:19 am
He also wrote the majority opinion in 1869 in Pacific Insurance Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:15 am
City of Oklahoma, 816 F.2d 539, 540-41 (10th Cir. 1987), alleging a right of privacy under the Florida state constitution and the United States Constitution; Brashear v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
(citations omitted).Third, the economic incentives are all wrong, as non-manufacturer liability rewards questionable practices by generic manufacturers and penalizes more careful competitors:Careful Drug Co. gets word from the field that its drug, “X”, might cure high blood pressure when a doctor comes to it with a case series. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:07 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:43 am
The Original Honeybaked Ham Co. of Georgia, Inc., the judge has hammered a federal agency for failure to produce social media in a timely manner. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Challoner, 423 U.S. 3 (1975), that when a federal court is making a prediction of state law under Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:12 am
To set the stage, Epic v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
For minors in Texas, their only option for contraceptive care without parental consent is through federally funded Title X clinics, which are required under federal law to serve women regardless of age; the federal law overrides state parental consent laws in this context. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
United StatesCourt: U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-50354 Opinion Date: August 16, 2011 Judge: Elrod Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Injury Law, Insurance Law Plaintiffs filed suit in district court against the United States, alleging negligence in record-keeping and the administration of a certain life insurance policy. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm
Further, state law could allow a corporation to indemnify a director or officer. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 5:52 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 8:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am
Supreme Court Upholds Agreement That Bans Class Arbitration Despite Costs Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Tompkins‟ case comports with the United States and Florida Constitutions. [read post]
