Search for: "GRANT v. STATE"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 61,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
In Biden v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court of the United States yesterday vacated the judgment in Wang v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 7:09 am
In his opinion granting Adnan a new trial, Judge Martin Welch noted that, pursuant to the opinion of the Court of Appeals of Maryland in Curtis v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 10:03 pm
MOSLEY, 423 U.S. 96 (1975) AND UNITED STATES v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:49 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:14 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States today granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
The other grant that week was Blueford v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:02 am
Thackston v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:12 am
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943). [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 10:24 am
The Sixth Circuit granted en banc review last week in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:05 pm
In Phase Forward Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 10:07 am
AND H.B., No. 11-0024 - STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
Tannenbaum also stated that Shantou and F&V’s new counsel, Locke Lord, had indicated that it would oppose the motion – but the order states that Locke Lord later withdrew its opposition. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:17 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:47 pm
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:05 am
We urge the Court to grant cert. this week in Huffman v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 2:37 pm
That case, Class v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 5:48 pm
Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. states that the parties have settled the case, conditioned upon the district court's grant of a Fed. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 11:20 am
The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari today on the question of whether the Second Amendment should be incorporated against the states, a question left open by D.C. v. [read post]
