Search for: "General Sound Corp. "
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,479
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2012, 11:01 am
“Allstate believes its claim processes support this goal and are absolutely sound. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
See, e.g., Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm
This is generally carried out using the principle of separability. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 11:22 pm
Commentators have responded skeptically (law-firm consultant David Barnard of Blaqwell doubts whether the approach will improve overall associate retention; Vivia Chen says “all this just sounds too peachy to be true”). [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:02 am
" Class actions have theoretical attractiveness, but in practice often accomplish little more than to "tilt the playing field" in favor of plaintiffs through (presumably) the intense pressure they generate for defendants to settle and for plaintiffs to churn the litigation to increase their fees:In theory, issues classes sound attractive - a way to simplify complex cases. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
This sounds obvious, but it can’t be stressed enough, since compliance can go a long way towards minimizing conflicts related to the discovery process, and also reduces costs. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 7:51 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:11 am
" Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:44 am
Sound lopsided? [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:34 am
Potential client sits down with business divorce lawyer and says, “I’m a minority shareholder in XYZ Corp. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 3:37 pm
Smith Corp. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 8:41 am
Normally, the determination of whether to grant a preliminary injunction generally rests in the sound discretion of the trial court. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
See generally Marachi Decl. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Most epidemiologic studies are not admissible. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:51 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
That sounds like "common sense" to us. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Despite its broad authority and flexible procedures—as well as favorable political winds—the FTC had trouble finding a sound footing. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
Judge Woodlock wryly commented upon the First Circuit’s ignoring the statutory mandate of Rule 702, by its embracing caselaw that predated the 2000 statutory amendment of the Rule: “While a 2000 amendment to Fed.R.Evid. 702 codified a rigorous reliability test, the Daubert line of cases has been read by the First Circuit as “demand[ing] only that the proponent of the evidence show that the expert’s conclusion has been arrived at in a scientifically sound and… [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Weber Aircraft Corp., 465 U.S. 792, 802 (1984); Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. [read post]
