Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 1081 - 1100
of 18,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2020, 3:43 pm
The petition acknowledged that Iskanian v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:00 pm
The second case we consider is U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
Their ability to make mistakes suggests that they’re mere mortals.Supreme Court justices: they’re just like us! [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:23 am
Here is the Statement of Claim in Hellyer et al v Justin Trudeau et al T-1789-16 launching a constitutional challenge of the Government of Canada's jurisdiction to sign, ratify and implement the proposed CETA. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:35 am
Justice Alexander. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:54 pm
Justice Gorsuch spoke of "killing patents":But, Mr. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:48 am
The answer is Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence from DHS v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:56 am
Justice Stephen G. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
That opinion was joined by seven Justices - Justice Scalia (who wrote it), along with the Chief Justice and Justices Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer, and Alito.Yesterday in Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 12:46 pm
Justice Buchanan writes the majority opinion and says:In Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am
Fenrich: You're referring to the 1978 amendments? [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:37 am
Crime and Consequences takes a look at the re-listed cases that will be considered at today’s conference. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 12:40 pm
Justice Smith begins his dissent by saying: "I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:07 pm
If you doubt that, re-read Justice Scalia’s opinion, joined by Roberts, Alito, and Thomas, in Rapanos v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy, for example, apparently recalling Neal Katyal’s Tuesday argument in B&B Hardware v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:27 am
The case, Ruan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 7:18 am
Doron Dorfman Braidwood v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:16 pm
But if you're an academic, particularly with a certain take (e.g., a critical or legal realist), you definitely might use this holding as an example of a certain approach to the law. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 11:14 am
Since they're often whacko, and to their substantial detriment. [read post]