Search for: "JOHN DOE, official and individual" Results 1081 - 1100 of 3,335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2020, 7:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Not only that, but those individuals who might be able to substantiate such a theory have been barred from providing testimony. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:45 am by Brian Greer
Readers should refer to the CIA’s official response to the study for that and make their own judgment. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
Does impeachment require a criminal act? [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
Only after making those factual determinations does the judge or jury apply those facts to the allegations and the correct legal standard to determine whether the allegations are sufficiently supported. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
John Elwood briefly reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
The committee will hear testimony from John Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:18 am by David Post
The House Democrats made the decision to base their case on the evidence provided by more subordinate officials, individuals who were not in a particularly strong position to say what the President's involvement or motives might have been. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Which does not sit well with Dottie Rivera, who does not want officials poking through her perfectly well-maintained home, which she rents. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The third ground for the article, for example, lists nine officials who refused to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry at the direction of the president—Mulvaney, Blair, National Security Council (NSC) lawyers John Eisenberg and Michael Ellis, NSC official Preston Wells Griffith, Vought, Duffey, Energy Department aide Brian McCormack, and State Department official T. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The instructions to executive branch officials not to comply are not Trump acting on his own, but have been supported by formal OLC opinions and followed by numerous officials who have their own private counsel advising them about their legal responsibilities. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Bernie Sanders says he does not want a super PAC. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It cites official programs as well as individual volunteer efforts, singling out for special praise retired Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy, as well as U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 7:00 am by Rebecca Friedman Lissner
Despite John Bolton’s extensive government experience, by the end of his tenure, a former White House official told the New Yorker: “The N.S.C. is no more, there is no process. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
The official website of the Guangdong Court said that the Supreme People's Court of Guangdong Province had rejected an appeal against the fine. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
The year 2019 is ending with the great rifts--opened in 2016, exposed in 2017, and acquiring a greater urgency and revealing the power of its consequences in 2018--now exposed. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 12:36 pm by News Desk
Federal, state, and local health and regulatory officials conducted traceback investigations from the six Jimmy John’s locations where ill people ate raw sprouts. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:00 am by Edith Roberts
“The fact that speakers may have influence over or access to elected officials does not mean that these officials are corrupt,” he explained, and “[t]he appearance of influence or access … will not cause the electorate to lose faith in our democracy. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
Attorney John Durham concerning the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, and a prior memo released in early 2018 by Rep. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 4:39 am by SHG
Despite having “considered carefully the fact that John Doe and Mary Smith admitted that they had engaged in consensual sexual intercourse before the two evenings at issue,” he made a “careful assessment” to conclude that John was nonetheless guilty—because John was “consistently vague” and Mary provided “specific details. [read post]