Search for: "Levi v Levi" Results 1081 - 1100 of 3,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm by Brittan J. Bush
R.S. 30:103.1 in order to avoid the immense penalties that may be levied against them under the Third Circuit’s interpretation of La. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:00 am by Steven B. Levy
Levy’s new book, coming in June: The Legal Project Management Field Guide: Five Tools for Busy Professionals.) [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 9:10 am by Eric
Paul Levy has an excellent and lengthy writeup about this case, the Blockowicz case and their implications. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:05 pm by Carter Ruml
 Olmstead may not be as important as, say, Gore v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Gostin, The Supreme Court, the Texas Abortion Law (SB8), and the Beginning of the End of Roe v Wade? [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:46 am by Thomas Swartz
The Court primarily noted that Penal Law § 60.35 (1) states that "there shall be levied at sentencing a mandatory surcharge, sex offender registration fee, DNA databank fee and a crime victim assistance fee in addition to any sentence required or permitted by law. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 1:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
I’m pleased to report that last week the Baltimore City Circuit Court finally vacated the initial Patel v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:15 am
Off the top of his head, this Kat recalls these cases: Case C-467/08 Padawan (non-discriminatory 'fair compensation' through private recording levies); Case C‑569/08 Internetportal und Marketing GmbH v Richard Schlicht (abusive .eu domain name registration); Case C‑20/05 Pubblico Ministero v Karl Josef Wilhelm Schwibbert (copyright royalty collection, affixing of marks and technical standards); Case C-376/22 Pie Optiek v Bureau Gevers,… [read post]