Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 4,943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2018, 12:49 pm
Other groups being sworn in today are from the Illinois State Bar Association and the Phi Alpha Delta law fraternity, although those contingents are fully contained in the bar section of the courtroom. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 8:43 am
In State ex rel. [read post]
26 May 2019, 9:53 am
Facts: This case (Kindoll v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 1:29 pm
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:42 am
Williamson v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:00 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:17 am
The way to win an argument is by stating (rather than embellishing) the facts and analyzing those facts in light of the applicable law (see law school brief writing 101). [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:10 am
The NY State Health Department has a regulation barring the use of state medicaid funds to cover the cost of gender reassignment and related treatments. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
A New York State court may soon be answering that question in Imax Corporation, v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 3:40 am
In Herpst v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm
§ 2244(d)(1), while a Nevada state prisoner loses under equitable tolling.McMonagle v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm
Wilson, 422 F.3d 1059 (10th Cir. 2005) (applying state action analysis under sec. 1983 to decide whether a hospital was barred from suing for libel) … ACLU of Minn. v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 1:22 pm
The case arose out of the robbery of a bar by two masked individuals, during which the owner of the bar was shot and [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:27 am
Kansas City T-Bones, Lexis WCAB Jurisdiction—Professional Athletes—WCAB, after granting reconsideration, affirmed WCJ’s finding that applicant’s claim for industrial injury to multiple body parts during period 1996 to 2005 while playing professional baseball for California and out-of-state teams was barred by Labor Code § 3600.5(d)(1)(B), when WCAB found that (1) applicant’s work for Los Angeles Dodgers (including Dodgers’… [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:54 am
On Tuesday in Greene v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 3:42 pm
Pusateri v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
Dec. 20, 2006) (construing “adapted to,” in light of patent as a whole, to mean “con- figured to,” not “capable of”).ANDsee generally Comark Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 5:43 pm
Granite State Ins. [read post]
13 May 2008, 5:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
