Search for: "Little v. State"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 24,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2009, 4:20 pm
New Albertsons, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
McElrath (1886) 68 Cal. 466 and Little v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 2:27 pm
New York (IGRA; Revenue Sharing)United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 2:28 pm
Hosp., 488 U.S. 204, 213 (1988).The "Little Tucker Act" was involved:The Little Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:16 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:16 am
[6] Brief of Amici Curiae State of West Virginia and 26 Other States in Support of Petitioners, Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 8:23 am
West Virginia’s statute allowing the carrying of a concealed weapon with a permit may be such an example, based on the February 23, 2016, ruling of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 8:23 am
West Virginia’s statute allowing the carrying of a concealed weapon with a permit may be such an example, based on the February 23, 2016, ruling of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 8:22 pm
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
” But it determined many of the allegations were entitled to “little weight” as part of its “substantial and material change in circumstances analysis. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:52 am
Applicant for employment as a corrections officer rejected because of misdemeanor convictionsMatter of Little v County of Westchester, 36 AD3d 616 Kith Little was disqualified for employment as a Westchester County corrections officer because he had been earlier convicted of misdemeanors. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:47 am
USA v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:04 pm
"So it adds a little levity to the world. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:38 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:30 pm
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court held in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:58 am
I think the question could have been better framed by saying “you have no evidence that” because it is a little hard to prove that negative. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:26 am
I have not been able to obtain much new information in the Archey v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
As stated in North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 he ‘is not an insurer against all hazards’. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
In United States v. [read post]