Search for: "Los Angeles v. Superior Court"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Los Angeles, 11-798, involves whether regulations implementing the Port of Los Angeles’s “Clean Trucks Program” are preempted by the Federal Aviation Administrative Authorization Act or, if you like living dangerously close to the edge of a Microsoft sticky-keys warning, the FAAAA. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 1:45 pm
A state Superior Court found in favor of the CA SoS but a Court of Appeal found that the PEMT Requirements did indeed betray characteristics of regulations and should therefore have gone through the regulatory procedure (for the legal eagles out there, see: County of San Diego v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:37 am
The USA The first case has been brought in the Los Angeles Superior Court in California. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
CAFA has prompted a flurry of single-state class actions filed in state courts, and recent statistics show that in at least one forum favored by the plaintiffs’ bar (Los Angeles), state class action filings continue to grow. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1146-1147. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:08 pm
Superior Court for determining whether workers in California should be classified as employees or as independent contractors. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 2:46 pm
Truck thought that it had established that its available limits of coverage have been exhausted, but this week California's Second District Court of Appeal concluded otherwise, reversing an earlier order of the Los Angeles Superior Court that had ruled in favor of Truck. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:56 am
Background and current status of Prop 65 coffee litigation This regulation follows an industry-wide litigation brought by the Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT) in which Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle found that coffee roasters and retailers failed to demonstrate that the levels of acrylamide – a chemical formed when coffee beans are roasted – did not pose a significant risk of cancer. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:56 am
Background and current status of Prop 65 coffee litigation This regulation follows an industry-wide litigation brought by the Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT) in which Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle found that coffee roasters and retailers failed to demonstrate that the levels of acrylamide – a chemical formed when coffee beans are roasted – did not pose a significant risk of cancer. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 6:52 pm
Kerner, who practices in Northridge, filed the suit in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Aetna Health Plans of California Inc., Aetna U.S. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Further on the characterization of this as an "activist" court, the Los Angeles Times reported today the views of Professor Gerald Uelmen of the University of Santa Clara Law School, who said he was "blown away" and "very surprised" by the decision. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:01 pm
Superior Court in which the S. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 1:06 pm
Novartis AG, California Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty., Transcript of Oral Argument on Post-Trial Motions, at 46 -47 (March 18, 2004) (Hon. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 5:06 am
Novartis AG, California Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty., Transcript of Oral Argument on Post-Trial Motions, at 46 -47 (March 18, 2004) (Hon. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
As for me and my firm, I have been practicing law in Los Angeles for 35 years. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:37 am
" On May 22, 2018, the plaintiff brought an action in the Los Angeles, California Superior Court for defamation and related torts against DMA and alleged affiliated individuals. [read post]
27 Nov 2024, 5:20 pm
Davis, 533 P.2d 222 (Cal. 1975), the California Supreme Court found that the Los Angeles Police Department’s alleged infiltration of UCLA courses and organizations to create dossiers on students and professors, without any suspicion of illegal activity, presented prima facie violation of the state constitutional right of privacy. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State responded the next day by filing a Notice of Related Case with the Superior Court. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The State responded the next day by filing a Notice of Related Case with the Superior Court. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm
City of Los Angeles (2018) 19 Cal.App.5th 465. [read post]
