Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 1081 - 1100 of 5,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2021, 4:34 am
  The record showed that third parties use the proposed mark to describe goods that do not contain meat. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 2:04 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark PARSONS for golf equipment and various ancillary goods and services (six applications, each in a different class), finding the mark to be primarily merely a surname under Section 2(e)(4). [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 7:25 am
Laboratoires Riva Inc. 2006 FC 889, the Federal Court held that the trade-mark DAMYLIN was not confusing with the mark CALMYLIN, even though both are used on cough syrup. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:56 am by Neil Melliship
  The concept of use is a fundamental tenet of Canada’s trademarks laws: the first person to use a mark in Canada in association with particular wares (goods) and/or services is generally the party entitled to obtain registration of that mark in Canada in association with those wares/services. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  TRIPS + Lanham Act both define marks broadly—anything capable of distinguishing goods/services. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 12:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In Geller, we applied a two-parttest to determine if a mark may be disparaging:(1) what is the likely meaning of the matter inquestion, taking into account not only dictionarydefinitions, but also the relationship of the matterto the other elements in the mark, the nature ofthe goods or services, and the manner in whichthe mark is used in the marketplace in connectionwith the goods or services; and(2) if that meaning is found to refer to… [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 3:14 am
In re AGPCH, S.A. de C.V., Serial No. 87125518 (April 18, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:08 am by John L. Welch
Moreover, the goods are relatively inexpensive and would be purchased with no more than ordinary care.As to the marks, the Board observed once again that when the involved goods are identical, a lesser degree of similarity between the marks is necessary to support a finding of likely confusion. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 2:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  When asked “What is the first thing that comes to your mind when you hear the name ‘Charbucks,’ spelled C‐H‐A‐R‐B‐U‐C‐K‐S? [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 12:45 pm by Giorgio Luceri
The new guidelines cover topics such as formality examination and procedures for trade mark applications, oppositions, declarations of invalidity, cancellations, classification of goods and services, examination of applications for change of trade mark ownership, trade mark renewal and other procedural issues. [read post]
9 May 2018, 3:20 am
In re Bell Rock Growers, Inc., Serial No. 86747927 (May 7, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
  Their collective view was that shape element (A) fell foul of Article 3(1)(e)(i) and shape elements (B) and (C) fell foul of Article 3(1)(e)(ii), but that neither Article 3(1)(e)(i) nor (ii) applied to all of (A), (B) and (C) together. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 9:34 am
A notice on subscription-only service Lawtel drew the IPKat's attention to C & J Clark International Ltd v Four Star Distribution, a ruling by Appointed Person Ruth Annand on 20 December 2006 against a UK Trade Mark Registry decision.Four Star applied for invalidation of Clark's CICA trade marks for footwear in Class 25, citing a likelihood of confusion with its own earlier CIRCA registered trade mark for clothing in Class 25. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 2:13 pm by Patrick A. Malone
Federal officials say this rating system, more common with restaurants and on review apps for the young, like Yelp, gives patient-consumers a fast, easy, clear, convenient way to start to deal with the complex, difficult issue of whether a hospital’s any good or not. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 8:05 am
  In addition to the encircled C, the word "copyright" or the abbreviation "copr" can also be used. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
The Board pointed to TMEP Section 1301.04(h)(iv)C), which cautioned examining attorneys to carefully examine webpages from social-networking websites to make sure that the mark in question is being used with the recited services. [read post]