Search for: "Material Motion Incorporated"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm
(“Hynix”) appealed the District Court of Northern California’s denial of Hynix’s motion to dismiss arising from Rambus Inc. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:49 pm
Strine Jr. issued an opinion denying a motion for preliminary injunction to halt a merger between Massey Energy Company and an affiliate of Alpha Natural Resources Inc. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:14 am
The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:18 am
Merely appending relevant documents to the motion brief does not constitute compliance with R. 1:6-6; such documents must be incorporated by reference in an appropriate affidavit or certification, which properly authenticates material which is otherwise admissible. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
The court, however, denied Honda's summary judgment motion on invalidity of the Notable Condition patent. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
LEXIS 12704 (7th Cir 6/23/2011) “[W]e reinstate and incorporate by reference our earlier opinion in Corcoran v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:37 pm
The Commission Investigative Staff (“OUII”) supported Lexmark’s motion. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Jefferson, the target of the search, eschewed his new position in the footnotes of history and brought a motion pursuant to Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure seeking the return of all materials seized by the Executive.The district court denied Jefferson’s motion but a panel of the D.C. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am
Plaintiffs’ motion was granted in November 2009. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
This "nexus of success" finding here is a thin cover, considering the claimed invention covered the accused product, whose success, as a matter of fact, could only be attributed to incorporating the invention.. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Fair Trial Denied Where Family Court Judge Took on the Function and Appearance of an Advocate In Matter of Jacquilin M, 83 A.D.3d 844, 922 N.Y.S.2d 111 (2 Dept, 2011) Jacqulin M. appealed from an order of disposition of the Family which, upon a fact-finding order of a hearing, finding that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, adjudged her… [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:34 am
Based on all this, the district court judge found that deliberately omitted material information from his warrant application, though he noted that the “deliberate omission ma have been by reason of insufficient training. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:21 am
The motion judge accepted this argument and dismissed the case.The Court of Appeal overturned the motion. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:32 am
Research in Motion, Ltd., 418 F.3d 1282, 1317 (Fed. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:16 pm
The court found that issues of reliance and materiality were too fact-dependent to be resolved on a motion to dismiss. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:51 pm
The complaint named as Respondents not only various Samsung entities who manufacture or distribute flash memory chips, but also downstream manufacturers and sellers of products incorporating such flash memory chips. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:37 pm
For the avoidance of doubt, the Parties agree that all Confidential Material (including but not limited to discovery responses, documents and things produced, depositions, summaries of the foregoing, and motion papers filed with the Court consisting of, incorporating or attaching Confidential Material) that are in the possession, custody or control of the Parties, their attorneys and/or their experts and consultants shall be destroyed on or before March 30, 2011,… [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:00 am
Related Content is another relatively new offering that incorporates materials from Matthew Bender, ALR, BNA, newspapers such as the Wall Street Journal and New York Times, and briefs, pleadings, motions, and court dockets. [read post]
30 May 2011, 10:27 am
(It’s pretty hard to do the multifactor test at the motion to dismiss stage! [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:39 am
Weekly D1049bAttorney's fees -- Prevailing party -- Mutuality of obligation -- Mortgage foreclosure -- A defendant was entitled to recover attorney's fees as a prevailing party under section 57.105(7), where mortgage entitled mortgagee to reasonable attorney's fees for enforcement, after court granted motion to dismiss mortgage foreclosure and dismissed the case without prejudice -- Pleading requirement -- It was proper for defendant to seek attorney's fees in a… [read post]
