Search for: "McDONALD v. STATE"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2009, 2:39 pm
" VWC File No. 229-99-31, Arthur Pierce v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am
McDonald (Deceased) v National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc, heard 12 – 13 February 2014. [read post]
10 May 2023, 7:48 pm
In the words of McDonald v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 10:51 am
O’Banner v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 10:51 am
O’Banner v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 4:38 pm
Coviello Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0447n.06 Tracy McDonald v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
Terry v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:43 am
McDonald’s Corp. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:13 am
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm
"); 554 US at 625 ("We therefore read [United States v] Miller [, 307 US 174 (1939),] to say only that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapon not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as short-barreled shotguns. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:20 am
Spam at McDonald's. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
** Citing Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, the Appellate Division's decision held the arbitrator was free to consider "parol evidence" concerning a past practice given the ambiguity the arbitrator found in Article 45, §E of the CBA.Click here to access the Appellate Division's ruling. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
** Citing Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, the Appellate Division's decision held the arbitrator was free to consider "parol evidence" concerning a past practice given the ambiguity the arbitrator found in Article 45, §E of the CBA.Click here to access the Appellate Division's ruling. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:25 pm
Aggressive tactics are used to police minor, nonviolent crimes every day, in every state. [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:13 am
The court also found that even after the federal government rescinded its agreement with the Sheriff's office authorizing officers to enforce certain provisions of immigration law, and after the Supreme Court made clear in Arizona v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 8:07 pm
See, for example, McDonald v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:22 am
“The Future of Gun Control in the United States After the Heller and McDonald Cases, with a Canadian Perspective on Gun Control Issues,” Saturday, August 6, 2011, 2:00 to 3:30 p.m., Room 713A, 700 Level, Metro Toronto Convention Center, South Building. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:04 pm
The case is ELVH, Inc. v. [read post]
