Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 1081 - 1100 of 3,454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2018, 4:58 pm by Phillips & Associates
Supreme Court has ruled that retaliation for reporting alleged Title IX violations is itself an intentional act of sex discrimination. 20 U.S.C. [read post]
17 May 2018, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  This seemed to be good enough for Supreme Court, but not for the Appellate Division. [read post]
11 May 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
" The Supreme Court should carve out an exception for injuries such as this. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Respondents argue that in finding that CONY was not a governmental agency, Supreme Court erred in limiting its inquiry to "a formalistic analysis where a practical, functional inquiry" would have been more appropriate. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court has so held as to obscenity and as to unprotected commercial speech. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 1:55 pm
  Supreme Court grants Corbel's motion and denies Arch's cross motion. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 12:00 am by Donovan Gibbons
On appeal, the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division (“Appellate Division”) held the lower court’s findings were premature and remanded the cases so a fairness hearing on the settlement could be conducted. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am by Dan Carvajal
[14] The Supreme Court established that gender-based classifications must serve an important government objective and be substantially related to the achievement of such objective [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 7:48 am by Eric Goldman
Still, combined with the California Supreme Court’s ruling in the de Haviland case (which we may blog soon), it’s been a good win for publicity rights defendants. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 8:57 pm by Paul Kirgis
The employee sought an order from Supreme Court compelling the employer to proceed with the arbitration under the terms of the agreement. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 7:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
As the Supreme Court noted in CardinalChemical, “[a]n unnecessary ruling on an affirmativedefense is not the same as the necessary resolution of acounterclaim for a declaratory judgment. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:20 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Supreme Court denied the wife’s motion, finding that the acknowledgment substantially complied with the requirements of the Real Property Law. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:20 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Supreme Court denied the wife’s motion, finding that the acknowledgment substantially complied with the requirements of the Real Property Law. [read post]