Search for: "O'Connor Law"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2022, 4:03 pm
" That opinion was written by Justice O'Connor, and joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Blackmun, Kennedy, and Scalia; Justice White concurred as to the principle. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:45 am
Alito has replaced O'Connor and may be expected to vote with Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy, who dissented in McConnell. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 7:21 am
Arbitrator O'Connor rejected the Union's challenge to the reopening. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 4:13 pm
If you are one of those people who lumps everyone that's to the Right of Justice O'Connor into one big pile, then you need to read this section. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 7:00 am
(See also my post on Frakes & Wasserman on time-crunched patent examiners.)The Essential Role of Courts for Supporting InnovationErin O’Hara O’Connor & Christopher R. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:30 am
PanelistsJoan Biskupic (L’93), Supreme Court correspondent, USA Today, and author of the forthcoming American Original: The Life and Constitution of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and of Sandra Day O’Connor: How the First Woman on the Supreme Court Became Its Most Influential Justice Susan Low Bloch, Professor, Georgetown University Law CenterRoy Englert, a partner at Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner and Sauber, who served… [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 1:30 am
Editors are Vivienne O'Connor and Colette Rausch. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:49 am
Clearly, something changed in O';Connor's thinking about public use between 1984 and 2005. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 7:12 am
Justices Moyer, Stratton, O'Connor and O'Donnell concurred, and Justices Pfeifer and Lanzinger dissented. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
O’Connor-Ratcliff appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 10:46 am
The early post-Buckley cases, such as Bellotti, and NCPAC were deregulationist, and were followed by the period I've called the New Deference, where the four liberals on the Court, joined by Justice O'Connor, upheld a wide range of campaign finance laws, including major provisions of the McCain-Feingold law (the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Act, or BCRA) in a number of different cases. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
The bulk of Comcast's legal work is done by about 25 firms; it is represented by seven in Philadelphia, including Morgan, Lewis & Bockius L.L.P., Dechert, Cozen O'Connor and Davis, Polk & Wardwell, and Freshfields of London. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:30 am
Law Firms (66)The Connecticut Law TributeFeb. 20, 2009DECHERTDechert Lays Off 19 AssociatesThe Am Law DailyFeb. 12, 2009 Law Firms Eliminating Staff MembersPhiladelphia Business JournalDec. 16, 2008 Dechert Chairman: Layoff Rumors Are ';Bull'The Legal IntelligencerOct. 22, 2008 Layoffs Hit Dechert Following Record Financial YearThe Legal IntelligencerFeb. 29, 2008 DEWEY & LEBOEUFDewey to Shutter San Francisco Office, Keep… [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 10:46 pm
Both parts of the study demonstrate that, on this "union-preserving" side of federalism, the five justices most responsible for the Rehnquist Court's "federalism offensive" - Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas - were largely indifferent to state policymaking autonomy. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
For instance, “William O’Connor” might sometimes label himself “Bill O’Connor” in some places, or “William OConnor” elsewhere. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
For instance, “William O’Connor” might sometimes label himself “Bill O’Connor” in some places, or “William OConnor” elsewhere. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
For instance, “William O’Connor” might sometimes label himself “Bill O’Connor” in some places, or “William OConnor” elsewhere. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
That would be Justice Thomas, which means we are at least 50 years away from seeing Justice O';Connor's taxpayer-funded papers. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
Justice Scalia's dissent offered this rejoinder to Justice O';Connor's concurrence: JUSTICE O'CONNOR argues that the discrimination in this law which must be justified is not its discrimination with regard to the sex of the partner but its discrimination with regard to the sexual proclivity of the principal actor. [read post]
18 May 2007, 5:19 am
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. [read post]
