Search for: "P V Holding Corporation" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,781
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2012, 7:40 pm by admin
For more about Canadian advertising and marketing law see: Misleading Advertising Canadian Advertising & Marketing Law For a copy of the Ontario Superior Court judgment see: Commissioner of Competition v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:26 pm by Ailyn Cabico
  The summary is not intended to be a comprehensive review of an Investment Adviser’s tax, partnership, corporate or other year-end requirements, nor an exhaustive list of all of the obligations of an Investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”) or applicable state law. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:26 pm by admin
On February 28, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada awarded compensatory and punitive damages to a contest entrant for misleading claims in a contest mail-out (see: Jean-Marc Richard v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 6:31 am
In the case of Gram Panchayat & Anr. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:59 am by WSLL
Holdings: The Court found that the district court correctly interpreted Wyo. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:43 pm by Rick Hasen
If it turns out that the implementation of the as-applied standard set out in the principal opinion impermissibly chills political speech, we will presumably be asked in a future case to reconsider the holding in McConnell v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:42 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
United Kingdom, ECHR-Reports 2001-XI, p. 101, Kalegoropoulou v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:51 am by Don Cruse
The holding was that all the signatures had to be thrown out because of this early (and decidedly counterproductive) corporate support (p. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:40 am by Rick Hasen
  As I explained in this Michigan Law Review piece on the case, the statement both defies common sense and is in direct tension with the Court’s holding in Caperton v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:47 pm by Record on Appeal
Today, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Acoba in Hamilton v. [read post]