Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 55,682
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2024, 10:14 am
Case Citation: Mercola.com, LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:03 am
While the defense argued that the defendants were not guilty of subversion as subverting state power involves the use or threat of force, the court referenced HKSAR v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:18 am
In the landmark case Gideon v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 8:00 am
”Think that manager was on a power trip? [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:57 am
After 23 petitions for certiorari, the Court finally granted Ramos v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:18 am
In Maia v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:18 am
The case is Prosec Guards CC v Department of Public Works and Infrastructure and Others (2501/23; 2502/23) [2024] ZAWCHC 139 (24 May 2024). [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:01 am
That's from Judge Kevin Newsom's concurrence yesterday in Snell v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
In some separation-of-powers cases (such as Dames and Moore v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm
In West Palm Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:33 pm
Snell v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 8:00 am
When Congress uses the reconciliation process, it limits its own power... [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
In Sheetz v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 5:52 am
This combination of the “two halves of the legal brain” enables lawyers to create brilliant first drafts and analyze documents using the power of generative AI. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:00 am
Thomas says the following about Brown v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:57 pm
ShareThursday’s opinion in Coinbase v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:45 pm
If we will not presently shoulder the burden of correcting our own mistake, they have the power to do so. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:42 am
Mr C’s position was that of a person in ‘accommodation plus’ need, as per R (Aburas) v London Borough of Southwark (2019) EWHC 2754 (Admin). [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
The Court found that the then Home Secretary Suella Braverman passed the anti-protest measures in June 2023 despite having not been given the power by Parliament to do so [100]. [read post]