Search for: "STATE v. SY" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,513
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to the attorneys' contention, that cause of action was pleaded with sufficient specificity (see CPLR [*3]3016[b]; Pludeman v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 10 NY3d 486, 492; PDK Labs v Krape, 277 AD2d 211), and the attorneys' documentary evidence failed to "resolve[] all factual issues as a matter of law, and conclusively dispose[] of the plaintiff's claim" (Brunot v Eisenberger & Co., 266 AD2d 421, 421; see CPLR 3211[a][1]). [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:29 pm
See Agere Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am by Melina Padron
Syed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1059 (07 September 2011) Immigration: Court of Appeal confirms Article 8 ECHR need not necessarily be considered when deciding whether to grant indefinite leave to remain. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Matter of Palandra v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 011 NY Slip Op 04357, Appellate Division, Third Department Maria Palandra was employed by the Elmont Union Free School District and eventually became its superintendent of schools. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
Universal Avionics Sys. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:09 am by Maxwell Kennerly
” Aside from a speeding ticket, Clark had no adult criminal record in the state of Connecticut as of fall 2009, according to the Independent. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:58 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Syed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1059 (07 September 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) FHR European Ventures LLP & Ors v Mankarious & Ors [2011] EWHC 2308 (Ch) (05 September 2011) Cadogan Petroleum Plc & Ors v Tolley & Ors [2011] EWHC 2286 (Ch) (07 September 2011) Kleanthous v Paphitis & Ors [2011] EWHC 2287 (Ch) (07… [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am by Marie Louise
(Spicy IP) TTAB precedential no. 20: Madrid opposer limited to single ground designated in ESTTA form: Hunt Control Sys. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:47 pm
Our decision in Robotic Vision Sys. [read post]