Search for: "STATE v. WOODS" Results 1081 - 1100 of 3,001
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 7:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The PATA states that New York law governs the interpretation of its terms, J.A. 219, and under that law we review the District Court’s interpretation of the PATA de novo, Dreisinger v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:34 pm by Lorene Park
Woods also cautioned: “Employers also should remember that Spokeo does not diminish state and local mini-FCRA requirements (e.g., the California ICRAA, New York’s Article 23-A, and New York City’s Fair Chance Act); as with the federal FCRA (especially until we see how lower courts will interpret Spokeo), employers should continue to be vigilant in complying with these local, state, and federal requirements. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:34 pm by Lorene Park
Woods also cautioned: “Employers also should remember that Spokeo does not diminish state and local mini-FCRA requirements (e.g., the California ICRAA, New York’s Article 23-A, and New York City’s Fair Chance Act); as with the federal FCRA (especially until we see how lower courts will interpret Spokeo), employers should continue to be vigilant in complying with these local, state, and federal requirements. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Ms Wood also criticised the cost of privacy orders as she says that only the wealthy can afford protection. [read post]
7 May 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Even a perceptive journalist like Zoe Williams was confused, not able to see the wood for the trees in such a long judgment. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
  And so it was that, as foretold, respondent in four-time relist Woods v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:37 am by Andrew Hamm
., the Center for Migration Studies will host a series of discussions on United States v. [read post]