Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 6,116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2020, 8:22 am
This post will be unusually blunt about my disenchantment with the state of our country, a topic I don’t normally discuss on the blog. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 5:11 pm
So the Fourth Circuit held today in Maryland Shall Issue v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:12 am
Not only did appellee’s arguments have virtually no likelihood of success because the seller had waived them, but its actions in bringing the appeal were found to be a tactic to draw out the proceedings as long as possible while knowing that it had no viable substantive defense (Quincy Bioscience, LLC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
The seller’s warning must be reasonably calculated to reach such persons, and the presence of an intermediate party will not by itself relieve the seller of this duty. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 5:08 am
”). [4] Greenman v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:14 am
The sellers appeal. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Farber v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
In other words, maybe the consumer buys BRAINSTRONG anyway, even if she knows there is a high chance it won't work or even a small chance it might hurt her.My favorite example of the "materiality" limitation on the deceptiveness bar is the GLASS WAX trademark upheld in Gold Seal Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:39 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am
Even with this in mind, the CJEU has been set up to answer the question of whether platforms like Amazon can have any liability in relation to the misuse of trademarks by sellers and handed down their judgment on this topic only a few weeks ago.The case of Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl concerned the sale of knock-off Davidoff perfume on Amazon. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am
Even with this in mind, the CJEU has been set up to answer the question of whether platforms like Amazon can have any liability in relation to the misuse of trademarks by sellers and handed down their judgment on this topic only a few weeks ago.The case of Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl concerned the sale of knock-off Davidoff perfume on Amazon. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am
Even with this in mind, the CJEU has been set up to answer the question of whether platforms like Amazon can have any liability in relation to the misuse of trademarks by sellers and handed down their judgment on this topic only a few weeks ago.The case of Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl concerned the sale of knock-off Davidoff perfume on Amazon. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am
Even with this in mind, the CJEU has been set up to answer the question of whether platforms like Amazon can have any liability in relation to the misuse of trademarks by sellers and handed down their judgment on this topic only a few weeks ago.The case of Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl concerned the sale of knock-off Davidoff perfume on Amazon. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 10:30 am
” USPTO v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 7:18 am
Sunfrog * Online Marketplace Defeats Trademark Suit Because It’s Not the “Seller”–OSU v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:04 am
Charvat v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 7:37 am
Case citation: U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:08 am
The Seller’s counsel submitted that section one of the BP GTCs 2007 conflicted with the Recap, and so did not form part of the sale contract. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:11 pm
Nutreance LLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 9:06 am
CCMS attorneys are litigating the case—Barrett et al. v. [read post]
