Search for: "Smith v. Childs"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2009, 6:15 am
Hapeman, 229 A.D.2d 807, 810, 646 N.Y.S.2d 583; Smith v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 2:12 pm
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 10:22 am
District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:42 pm
Dover) Both courts followed the same lines of reasoning and cited most of the same cases, panamount here being Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Summaries will also be posted to Smith’s Case Compendium, here. (1) Sufficient evidence supported dogfighting convictions; (2) Leading question during State’s direct examination was not error; (3) The trial court did not err by ordering restitution for all the seized animals or by failing to explicitly consider the defendant’s ability to pay, but erred in converting the restitution award to a civil judgment absent statutory authorization State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
The court rejected the defendant’s invitation to overrule or limit to child victims its holding in State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:44 am
R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster & Ors) v North Yorkshire County Council, heard 3 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe Estates Ltd (Scotland), heard 4 December 2019 AM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4-5 December 2019. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled, in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:44 am
If there was one strategic error by counsel in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court heard arguments in Fulton v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am
State v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:38 am
State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
” But in a similar case, Smith v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 6:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am
Barnes and Smith v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
In one case, a senior VP’s note that an employee was “given special consideration” and her supervisor’s remark about her “retarded brother” suggested that her relationship with her blind and severely autistic brother-in-law was a factor in the decision to fire her, so her association discrimination claims would go to trial (Smith v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 7:31 am
Ray v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 7:31 am
Ray v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:58 am
Smith. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:01 am
And the possibility of such shenanigans bears on the Hassell v. [read post]
