Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 13,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am
Coverage of the Court continues to focus on the fallout from its recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 9:12 am
Ct. 1773 (2017), the United States Supreme Court addressed an effort by plaintiffs to bring 600 product liability claims, mostly by non-Californians, in the form of a mass tort action in California state court. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 9:12 am
Ct. 1773 (2017), the United States Supreme Court addressed an effort by plaintiffs to bring 600 product liability claims, mostly by non-Californians, in the form of a mass tort action in California state court. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 5:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm
How, if he becomes president, might the civil war begin, since there will certainly be no Fort Sumter to signal the beginning, and the California vote for secession apparently won't take place until 2019. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December in In Re United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:42 pm
United States District Court Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz (Southern District of California) denied Defendants' motion for an award of attorney's fees after the Defendants obtained a dismissal of plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:03 am
United States Department of Transportation et al, 15-cv-04987 (N.D. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:53 am
United States, 102 Fed. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:30 am
Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 pm
In the end, the California Supreme Court ruled in Robey v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:24 pm
” David Spade v. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 10:48 pm
In White v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:47 am
In the immediate face of uncertainty, franchisors with only a small number of franchisee units may withdraw or refuse to locate in California; large, sophisticated franchisors may curb expansion in the state. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in the case of Brendlin v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
That mattered for the 2010 congressional-election cycle.An even more dramatic example is United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
The United States Supreme Court held that California’s exercise of jurisdiction violated BMS’s due process rights. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:32 pm
Rather than recite the facts of this extremely interesting case, I'll merely cut-and-paste the money quote from Judge Wardlaw's majority opinion (to which Judge Pregerson dissents):"Once again, an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of California overstepped the boundaries of permissible questioning and argument. [read post]
