Search for: "State v. Hernandez"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 1,144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:14 pm
For instance, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 9 of the Texas Constitution both protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am
“There should be a clear legal recognition of Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism,” Zelenskyy said. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 10:03 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office, 653 F.3d 1329 (Fed. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
” The facts of Irvin v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Hernandez, 315 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. 2010). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Defendant also fails to attach a copy of its own answer, but does not state that its motion is one for pre-answer dismissal. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Moreover, over 50 years after the Supreme Court invalidated miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:45 pm
I'm unclear as to whether the Court will entertain briefs of excess of 80 pages in capital cases under Hernandez v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 7:10 am
And it has refused to infer a cause of action in tort cases involving damages suits against government officials in other cases Griffith cites, such as Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
., LP v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 12:30 am
i4i files Supreme Court argument, US Government agrees The i4i v Microsoft battle is definitely an old IP story dating back to 2007, but only three weeks ago i4i filed their reply to Microsoft's appeal in the U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Similarly, if someone’s cat does not roam outdoors, it can remain unaltered.SB 250 does not cost the state any money. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:19 am
Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:39 am
In a cross-border shooting case, Hernandez et al. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
On the patent side of the house, patent law is still in a state of (what I hope is) temporary insanity (at least I hope it’s temporary) about section 101 (patent subject matter) eligibility and the definition of “abstract idea” and other silly things. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:12 pm
(T.W.N.) v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:34 pm
State, supra, 744 A.2d 864, 886-889; Lewis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:27 am
Sergio Hernandez, Sean O’Key, Amanda Watts, Byron Manley and Henrik Pettersson report for CNN. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 1:01 pm
Hernandez. [read post]
